Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : To be a Liberal,you have to believe that..... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: c.horn who wrote (523)	9/6/1999 1:39:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6418

Of course abstinence would impinge on their Constitutionally protected right to fornicate. <g> JLA

To: c.horn who wrote (523)	9/6/1999 1:54:00 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6418

You actually agree about it being <<<the poor who will suffer, and the unwanted, sometimes damaged, babies they are to be forced against their will by the government to grow in their abdomens. >>> and your answer to this problem is... let them give up sex..? Oh. Well, it's only bliss. Sexual desire, arousal and orgasm are only the most intensely pleasurable, joyful, desperately and urgently needed sensory/emotional experience we are capable of having in our physical bodies. But... because of your religious precepts, others should just... give it up. Or you would have the government make them suffer. And of course you do know that many incidents of sexual union are not exactly lustful acts on the woman's part? I don't refer only to rape. I refer to the fact that many women do what they have to do when they have to do it to satisfy a man. I suspect many of the women who bleed to death after bothed illegal abortions, leaving many children at home are in this category, don't you? Just an intuition. Life is often not either easy or romantic. I am not sorry I posted. I like it when views like yours are made public for all to see.