SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Carolyn who wrote (8529)9/6/1999 10:24:00 PM
From: bearcub  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9818
 
hi, carolyn, thanks for responding, even if you clicked on the wrong name :)

here's the post from my sister-in-law i promised you:

Pretty scary stuff. [referring to some factual stuff i sent her 2 months ago] I have begun to notice a lot of blame-shifting already. And we as a hospital are considering buying certain new equipment since the not so old stuff will not be guaranteed by manufacturer. And HMOs want us to sign off that we are compliant in billing systems, but they don't want to do same.

so although I don't have your level of concern, I have more than I had.

Fond regards,


i will be interested in hearing what your husband's hospital has to say. and if you give me permission, i'd like to forward whatever your anecdotal response to my sister-in-law when you post it. maybe his hospital has come up with a few tricks she could use to get HMO's to 'co-operate.' hope you had a pleasant holiday.



To: Carolyn who wrote (8529)9/6/1999 10:54:00 PM
From: C.K. Houston  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9818
 
<Yes, my husband was a doctor. I do not believe Y2K will be a problem but do believe that you think it will be. I had intended to contact my husband's hospital tomorrow to check out bearcub's concerns, but now I am not so sure I will.>

Perhaps you should have your husband's hospital contact some of these people referenced below? (What I feel or think really doesn't matter in this regard. Does it?)

Bearcub gave you a link that was 1-1/2 yrs old. The hospital would have been rather dismissive of you, had you only presented them with something that was from May 1998, rather than more up-to-date information which you can find here: rx2000.org

An interesting item from that site ...

Y2K EMERGENCY: AUGUST 5, 1999

TOM BEARDEN: But even after three years and $20 million, there are still non-complaint devices in the hospital, like this $24,000 bedside monitor. Jim Young is director of the college's biomedical engineering department.

JIM YOUNG, Medical College of Georgia: Because when you advance the date from 1999 to year 2000 it defaults back to 1980. I can show you that. There's the July 21, 1999, and when you increase the date, it goes to 1980.

TOM BEARDEN: If it isn't fixed, the monitor will record false data. The hospital will install a free, upgraded microchip before the end of the year, but other biomedical devices couldn't be fixed and had to be replaced. For example, modern intravenous pumps use microchips to meter dosages, and some models would simply stop working when the date rolls over to 2000.

JIM YOUNG: This particular device -- which delivers IV fluids -- has a program in it for calculating drug dose. In that calculation you have to enter the patient's age. And certainly when you want to enter age, it includes a month, date and a year. And with the millennium bug, if you don't have a four-digit number, if it rolls over to 00, you have no way of knowing whether it's the year 2000 or 1900.

TOM BEARDEN: So it would throw the device haywire in terms of trying to calculate what the correct dosage would be?

JIM YOUNG: It would not calculate it.

TOM BEARDEN: As a result, the hospital had to replace all 525 of the $1,200 devices with new leased units.

DWAIN SHAW, Medical College of Georgia: What this represents .....

TOM BEARDEN: Dwain Shaw heads the hospital's Y2K task force. He says there were literally thousands of such devices to be considered ...
rx2000.org

Perhaps you don't find this alarming. I do.

Cheryl



To: Carolyn who wrote (8529)9/7/1999 6:24:00 PM
From: Edwarda  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9818
 
Hi, Carolyn!

Yes, you are correct: Cheryl really does believe the Y2K is going to be a horror show. However, I just talked to a couple of people high up on the technical and marketing sides of Computer Associates and, because of what the company is seeing in its worldwide customer base, they are not on the side of the worriers. They acknowledge that there will be lots of problems--problems, not disasters. Same info from a friend in the intelligence end of the State Dept.