Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : To be a Liberal,you have to believe that..... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (799)	9/7/1999 3:09:00 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6418

Which, of course, brings in the federalist question. If the majority of Californians want (a) and the majority of the whole country wants non-(a) (assuming we can get agreement on what the majority really wants) do the Californians have the right to legislate (a), or can the rest of the country override their desire and pass non-(a) legislation which forces Californians to obey non-(a) against their preferences? Be careful if you come down too strongly on the states rights side -- there are still states which I believe would restore segregation if they had the option. And how about on the local level? How far down do these rights of self-determination go??