SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Charles R who wrote (71528)9/9/1999 3:50:00 PM
From: Michael DaKota  Respond to of 1574096
 
Well...this is really entertaining:)

Shark comment on the 100 MHz Coppermine chips :

"You'll notice there are two CPUs in that list that are based on Coppermine technology yet operate at a 100MHz front side bus. This is due to the fact that Intel has sold far more 440BX based mainboards than they expected over the past 120 days and they're not anxious to force these consumers, particularly in the corporate arena, to abandon the PCs they just bought.
This way, Intel can offer them CPUs that bring more performance than they currently have without a full system upgrade being necessary. "

And what happens when people abandon there pc's, and discover that the best thing to buy is....a k7!
Offering superior performance over it's intel saplings, at
a comparable price, K7 will be a good investment for any customer who was willing to pay big bucks for an intel before.
Intel is chickening out, and wants to keep there customers bound to their old system (read : bx-based architecture), because when customers have can choose what they want to buy
"from scratch" they probably go with athlon, and when customers have to upgrade....well, there's only one solution there huh? the P3-550. Saves costs!

:)



To: Charles R who wrote (71528)9/9/1999 4:02:00 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1574096
 
An interesting comment on Sharkeys page:

"In raw performance these two improvements should add an increase of approximately 15 to 25% to Coppermine Pentium III CPUs versus current Pentium IIIs when running at identical MHz levels. "

If true, this would move the Coppermine well ahead of the MIAthlon in integer performance and very close in FP. Funny, I remember someone mentioning that a few weeks back....

EP



To: Charles R who wrote (71528)9/9/1999 4:04:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574096
 
Chuck - RE: Sharky's CPU Guide

Sharky says Cuontimemine WILL have a larger L1 cache. If true, that would make it perform better than I have expected because I thought L1 cache wasn't going to get bigger. Can't wait to see the benchmarks/comparisons.