Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Process Boy who wrote (71613)	9/10/1999 1:29:00 AM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1575396

RE <<<Do you know the criteria preannouncing on the upside? I believe it's a lot looser than for having to preannounce on the downside, as long as expectations are managed.>>> I think it is the same....anything that will have a material effect on the stock price, negative or positive, must be disclosed to the public in general. Tad gave a detailed explanation a while back. I will try to find it. DRBES may want to comment as well. ted

To: Process Boy who wrote (71613)	9/10/1999 1:35:00 AM
From: Charles R	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575396

PB, <The SRAM test vehicle has run faster than 1GHz in the .18um process ... This implies that CPU's will be at this speed as well. > The above statement was posted on this thread earlier addressed to you. Want to comment on CPU running at the same speed as SRAM on the same process? What is the fastest an SRAM will run on 0.35? 500MHz? 550MHz? How about 0.25? Chuck