Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ramsey Su who wrote (1396)	9/10/1999 8:31:00 PM
From: Sawtooth	Respond to of 13582

<<OK boys and girls, I am back. So the couple of kids who had been pushing the envelope here better start behaving.>> Response withdrawn during a flash of better judgement. (Welcome back. <ggg>)

To: Ramsey Su who wrote (1396)	9/10/1999 8:48:00 PM
From: Peter Sherman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13582

Irwin is coming to NYC next week. It MAY be true that he is meeting with analysts but I know for sure that he is meeting directly with the biggest shareholders. Why? Gregg has posted that he doesn't think the handset business can be sold. I agree. Also timed to his visit in NYC is huge co-operative QCOM/Sprint blitz ad campaign featuring the 860 and showing it going through a wringer and coming out as the "thin phone"... or Thinphone [tm] -- this indicates that Sprint recognizes importance of "branding" the handset...and is commited to it..

To: Ramsey Su who wrote (1396)	9/11/1999 1:09:00 AM
From: Bux	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13582

Ramsey Su, may I remind you this is supposed to be a class joint. In your post (which consisted of four one liners) you have managed to flame Maurice, post three off topic one liners of which one mentions some measly 20% drop in QCOM shares. That certainly borders in the grey area. Do you really think this place is populated by people with nothing more important to do than calculate the value of their QCOM shares? Dollars are too flimsy to value Q shares anyway, it should be the other way around. That means $1.00 is worth .006 Q shares. Just don't tell our pal Al. He might discover he's been asleep at the wheel while inflation has run rampant. Welcome back Ramsey, but we will be watching you. P.S. I can't believe you would spend your discretionary income on a silly vacation when QCOM is still such a bargain. Bux