SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Ultra Petroleum (UPL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bob Walsh who wrote (4380)9/11/1999 2:37:00 PM
From: Hickory  Respond to of 4851
 
Bob,

Thanks for addressing my last question with your very clear response.

Apparently I may conclude, then, that Arrowhead, the company, MAY suffer if it is proven that a majority of its directors acted wrongly in repudiating the Laird deal and forging a different amended agreement with UP.

However, at this point I'm not aware of actions that would make UP, the company, liable for damages. If I am in error, I would appreciate someone pointing out to me clearly and factually, where I am in error. Thanks guys.



To: Bob Walsh who wrote (4380)9/13/1999 10:43:00 AM
From: ISPYOIL  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4851
 
read the lawsuit, it is about Ultra as well as the interlocking bod members, UP is accused of selling Arrowheads interests without having them and damaging Arrowhead, then the interlocking bod members ie Jarvis and Hislop fired Laird and killed his deal to scuttle AOW to benefit UP and ultimately RIS which they have a much bigger interest in than AOW. but please read it for yourselves,I'm only passing on what I hear,


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News