Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : To be a Liberal,you have to believe that..... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: nihil who wrote (1827)	9/11/1999 8:41:00 PM
From: chalu2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6418

I'm a little confused by your fact patterns (why are A & B tried?--aren't they the victims). I don't have problems with two trials on different offenses with this proviso: that the facts asked to be found by the juries are different in each case. What bothers me is an acquittal where Jury A finds that M was not in Sacramento on the evening A/B were killed there; and then M is tried the second time, with Jury B finding that M was in Sacramento, and convicts him. That troubles me, and gives me pause.