Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Truth about Waco -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James F. Hopkins who wrote (951)	9/15/1999 8:49:00 PM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1449

James, where do you think that the UN forces would be the biggest benefit to the US? Would they clean outhouses at fairs? Would they be considered another branch of the military besides the Navy, Army, Air Force, etc...... Good grief, our President gets a BJ in the White House and he is almost removed from office. You think he could call in the poor excuse for troops from the UN? Even if it was possible for a UN force to be deployed in the US, which is almost impossible, it makes no sense. The only reason for the success in UN missions in the past has been because of US involvement. So, by deploying UN troops in this country, you are actually deploying U.S. UN troops in this country. Hmmmm!? James, weren't you the one who was scared to death of President Clinton calling in and deploying the Girl Scouts in this country? Weren't you the one who said that the New World Order of Girl Scouts were going to take away American's freedoms by deploying girl scout cookies laced with subliminal messages? <g>