Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : A.I.M Users Group Bulletin Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: HighTech who wrote (8542)	9/17/1999 6:21:00 PM
From: Dataminer1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18928

Do you know if the A.I.M. software out there is set up to make changes in ANY of the elements of A.I.M?(safe,port.control) Hello HiTech, Our current AIM spreadsheet (PCA), allows you to adjust just about everything except the Port. Control. The new version, which is coming along nicely, will have this added feature along with the "Vealie" option. (Automatically skip the trade and add 1/2 to the PC). It will also include some new variables such as split minimums and a negative cash option. Other features will include the ability to easily adjust for splits and dividends, and the option of adding or removing cash at any point. The current spreadsheet is a lot of fun to tinker with, though the upcoming release will be a quantum leap. You can see our current PCA as well as some preliminary screenshots of our upcoming version at: stocksystem.com I know that Newport software does currently include some of the features you are interested in. PCA was originally intended to be more of a back-tester, but the true AIM aficionado works with both. Hope this helps. Regards, Bill ps. The downside to AIM investing. I've been selling off small chunks of my SUNW for several years now, and now, with a split just announced, I figured out what I would have had with "buy and hold"....ohh well, a nice problem to have anyway !

To: HighTech who wrote (8542)	9/19/1999 7:52:00 AM
From: OldAIMGuy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18928

Hi HT, The PCA software allows you to put in lots of historical data and then change the SAFE parameters to see what would happen with these new values. As a broad brush, if you are thinking of using AIM with diversified mutual funds, split SAFE into two components and set the Buy SAFE to near zero. This maximizes AIM's positive feedback loop to Portfolio Control and has AIM buy more aggressively. Keep the Sell SAFE near the 10% mark and keep your minimums for trading as small as possible/practical for the transaction costs. Second, it has been my experience that diversified funds take about two steps forward for each they take back. Over time AIM's cash reserve would become way too large relative to the invested portion if it were followed to that extreme. You can make periodic adjustments to the Portfolio Control to replace some of the SELL orders along the way and keep the overall cash reserve level to a more logical amount. Typically for "aggressive growth" type funds, a 33% cap on the Cash Reserve works quite well. For a "growth and income" type you could probably reduce it to about 20% of total value and essentially never run out of cash. What's going to be optimum for one fund might be different for another. However, having a good feel for just how AIM works in the first place is VERY important. Please run standard examples first, analyze the shortcomings and then set about making minor changes and see if things improve. Over the years I've done countless "what if" examples. The two simple changes for mutual funds of altering SAFE and capping cash gave the biggest bang for the buck. (see execpc.com for a summary) Individual stocks are trickier. Very conservative stocks may do well with a 33% cash reserve max. but companies with higher BETA measures and more rapid (irratic) growth might still require a 50% level at times. I split my Idiot Wave into two pieces, one for mutual funds or conservative stocks and the other value for more rapidly growing stocks. Remember that AIM was designed to be a very simple Equity/Cash proportioning device. There's a million ways to complicate our lives and then there's AIM to simplify it. Please try not to complicate AIM so much that it loses its simplistic beauty. You'll be happier with the results. There's also been attempts to change the size of the "feedback loop" with AIM. I think some have made it work, but it's a very individual thing. One of the correspondents has changed AIM's buying habits with a "half way to the wall" strategy. All these ideas can be explored, but again it's good to understand the initial program first. Proportional control devices are peculiar animals. When we tinker with them sometimes the pendulum can get swinging pretty wildly! If we don't know where we started, it's harder to get things back into control. We'll all be happy to help with our combined experiences, so keep the questions coming. Best regards, Tom