Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tunica Albuginea who wrote (709)	9/17/1999 12:44:00 PM
From: Bill Ounce	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 69300

I repeat, science can say nothing about God. You can not use Science to prove or disprove God's existence. if you could, then God could be incorporated into Science. For example, you can not use "then a miracle occured" in a mathematical proof trying to prove something like a^2 + b^2 = c^2. Perhaps God did make things that way, and that is wonderfully miraculous, but it's not part of Math or Science. Your understanding of Evolution and Science is faulty. Please read up on the FAQs so you have some idea of the the opinion of the scientific community really is. You can start at talkorigins.org You seem to believe that the existence of miracles/paranormal means that Science can say things about God, or prove your perception of God is correct. But this gets really complicated in a hurry. Catholics do a great job of recording strange things happening. I chatted with a Muslim and he said they experience miracles as well. An acquaintence from India say that Hindus experience miracles too. Miracles occuring just mean that Science can not explain everything. Some fundies resolve this by saying that deamons produce all the non-Christian miracles, but how can you prove this in a scientific manner? But non-christians say similar things about Christian miracles. It's becomes a real mess. Think about it.