SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Jackson who wrote (72554)9/20/1999 5:48:00 PM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575771
 
Bill,

Ted, 40 miles away is an area of light damage with a quake of 7.5 or so. Older buildings will get cracks, a
few will fall.


I don't know about that. Loma Prieta in 1989 was a 7.1, and tell it to the people all the way from Santa Cruz to San Francisco that they were in an area of light damage. That's about 70 miles as the crow flies. Now, I'm not saying the whole of that span got hammered, but certain areas, depending on the firmness of the ground under them, like SF's Marina district, were. Los Gatos was also a disaster area, even though there is a mountain range between them and the center. Unfortunately, for Los Gatos, the San Andreas fault connected the dots on the map.

Tony



To: Bill Jackson who wrote (72554)9/20/1999 5:52:00 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575771
 
Bill

RE <<<Ted, 40 miles away is an area of light damage with a quake of 7.5 or so.>>>

It depends on the kind of quake it was (up and down vs sideways motion), how long it lasted and how deep in the ground. In the LA quake, areas 12-15 miles from the epicenter were damaged nearly as bad as the epicenter; that was because the fault zone where the quake occurred was only one mile into the ground and the quake moved out from the epicenter in rolling waves. In addition LA's quake was only a 6.8; the one in Taiwan is significantly bigger if the 7.6 magnitude holds up. That in itself will make a big difference in the degree of damage.

Like Steve said, we will know more as it becomes daytime over there. And one good thing; like the LA quake it occurred in the early dawn hours. That helped to minimize the numbers injured since most people were in bed.

ted



To: Bill Jackson who wrote (72554)9/20/1999 5:58:00 PM
From: Shane Geary  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575771
 
Bill - Re" The UMC building should be OK, as to the alignment of the line and internal damage??, that is the question"

I seem to remember a couple of fabs in the Kobe, Japan, area being not too badly affected by the earthquake there. If I remember correctly, it depends if 'earthquake precautions' will have been taken (eg anchoring equipment etc).