Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DanZ who wrote (3821)	9/21/1999 12:47:00 AM
From: Mama Bear	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

" leads me to point out the reasons why my name appears on the most PeopleMarked list on SI." Can you tell us the reason that Bill Wexler is 42 names above you? It can't be because he's had more time since you joined 3 weeks before he did. Message 9880184 Barb

To: DanZ who wrote (3821)	9/21/1999 1:27:00 AM
From: RockyBalboa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Number two, I don't condone hype and liars like Wexler. When? Pls, show evidence that BW lied to the public (SI pubic). .... In contrast, BW always backed up his opinions with facts, and after the expectations materialized, summarized his earlier posts with his recoommendations (CUST, CSCO, ZONA, ...) for documentation reasons. Unless bantered, BW sees no need to re-justify his position every hour, like you do. Doing so, could provide self assurance in sticking with a troublesome position, but it is not advisable. In many of your postings, I see that you are very nervous about your GUMM position. To me this is clear, having paid 11 leaves you with little profit margin. It almost looks as if the size of your position puts you under emotional distress. How about exiting half of the position and buying back when the next q is due and perhaps favorable results (winter season) may come in?