SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: grok who wrote (30139)9/22/1999 10:39:00 AM
From: Dave B  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
KZ,

<Coming Monday:

Bogus benchmarks with
Rigged results from
Contrived comparisons showing
Manipulated matchups>


Feel free to take out ads in the Wall Street Journal, PC Week, and PC Magazine; put up billboards; write letters to the editors; show commercials on TV (maybe you can get the Stuart guy); and shout out your opinions about it from the rooftops.

Good luck. I'll bet that almost everyone will trust Intel's, Dell's, (you know the list) opinions first.



To: grok who wrote (30139)9/22/1999 1:24:00 PM
From: Dave B  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 93625
 
KZ,

More thoughts on why the benchmarks will be "real" ...

Automobile companies do not talk about the fact that their car can do 35 MPH in a 35 MPH zone. Why? Because everyone's car does 35 MPH in a 35 MPH zone. Instead, they present the features of the car that differentiate their car from other cars. That is what Intel is going to begin doing on Monday -- present benchmarks that differentiate their systems. Benchmarks of word processing software and spreadsheet software will probably show little gain with RDRAM versus SDRAM. And maybe you don't need RDRAM to use MS Word. But you know what? You don't need an Athlon or PIII either. You don't need PC-133 SDRAM -- 66Mhz SDRAM will work just fine. I use a Pentium-200 based system and all the letters appear on the screen exactly when I type them in MS Word. No delay. It works great. I have no complaints about using MS Word on my system. So why bother upgrading to even a system with a faster processor?

Because there are other things I do that slow the system down tremendously. I scan in old family photos at high resolutions (the resulting files are usually about 100M). I print those files out. I run queries against the IDC PC Tracker database on my system which can take 2-3 minutes. I run web queries constantly to see if you've posted any new messages, along with other sites I follow. I don't yet have a DVD-ROM drive, but I have movies, and fully expect to have the drive soon. I expect that soon we'll see on-line sites, as Sony announced, from which I can watch movies on-line as long as I have the necessary bandwidth into the system.

On top of that, the operating system software keeps getting more complex. I just checked the Windows 2000 web site again. I missed this when we were having the 64M vs 256M discussion before, but I just discovered that a Windows 2000 Ready PC today is a 300Mhz or higher Pentium-class system. THE P-200 SYSTEM I BOUGHT JUST 3 YEARS AGO CAN'T EVEN BE CONSIDERED WINDOWS 2000 READY!!!!!!! I'm stunned, to be completely honest. I was debating about whether to upgrade or not, and now I find that my system isn't even powerful enough to run W2000.

The point is that when I bought the system, it was state of the art and could run anything thrown at it. Three years later, it probably won't even be able to run the latest version of Windows. Technology keeps marching on.

Intel is probably going to push this concurrency thing in the 820 that they've already presented on their site. It's new and differentiates the chipset. They will cover very explicitly the benefits of concurrency. I don't claim to understand it but my guess is that it separates the video stream coming from memory from the application needs, though I could be way off base. Assuming for a moment that I'm right, though, in a year we'll see much more exciting video applications because it has enabled new capabilities. And you guys have already admitted that RDRAM is good for video streaming.

So, no, don't expect Intel to stand up and announce "our car goes 35 MPH in a 35 MPH zone like everyone elses". Expect them to announce "our car is supercharged for the future and let's you go much faster than their car when you get out on the new superhighways."

Dave