SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: slacker711 who wrote (1815)9/22/1999 4:43:00 PM
From: Ruffian  Respond to of 13582
 
qdog, Didn't Japan go its own way back when, with a look a like GSM standard? eom



To: slacker711 who wrote (1815)9/22/1999 5:17:00 PM
From: qdog  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13582
 
I'm curious, why do you think that QCOM is the only company that has IPR's where CDMA is concern? Why was it that certain companies that QCOM licensed, cross license patent with QCOM for more favorable fee's and what were those patents?

I guess I missed the discussion about QCOM is an anagram for CDMA.

The short answer is, go their separate ways and deploy there respective proposed standard.

Bandwidth hog, that MSFT.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News