Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (72752)	9/22/1999 6:09:00 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574326

Elmer, <I'm sure you're right, that was Ali's point, but everyone knew that already. Charles knew that too. He wanted to know when it was locked in manufacturing.> Everyone but you. No need to squirm, boy. Few posts ago you rambled about TESTING, Message 11329507 which implies that you think that different FSBs are result of some binning process, and therefore it would require some decision to be made during bin sorting. My experience lead me to believe that this is false, every Pee chip is capable to run 133FSB with big margins. Therefore this is a plain business decision what value to lock-in. On what stage it happens I do not know, but it does not matter whatsoever. That was my point. Boy, why everything needs to be chewed out for you, letter by letter?