Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lucky Charm who wrote (41113)	9/23/1999 12:15:00 AM
From: faqsnlojiks	Respond to of 43774

Hi Lucky...long time, no hear! -Joe (was faqsnlojiks)

To: Lucky Charm who wrote (41113)	9/23/1999 12:23:00 AM
From: J T	Respond to of 43774

Thanks Kristi!

To: Lucky Charm who wrote (41113)	9/23/1999 1:51:00 PM
From: jhild	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 43774

Lucky, I appreciate the position that Erraff has put you in, but this isn't really enough. You never held back on disseminating positive information when you were long the stock. When saying something positive would benefit your investment. For instance you clearly never researched the issue of the registered in 50 states declaration. To now say that you have damaging information, that you have written documentation that could destroy the stock is a pretty strong statement. Yet you will not be forthcoming and share what you have heard? You are unwilling to relate the information and clearly describe it as rumour or allegation? You think people can't use their minds and give the information appropriate weight? You would deny them information that they may be able to provide corroboration for. You would deny them the ability to make sense of the misrepresentations that the company has engaged in. What you are really doing is denying the public and your fellow investors the ability to see the true picture. You are biasing the presentation of the story in favor of promoting the company. You can't have it both ways. You can't cheerlead for the company and then be silent when credible information arises that casts them in a less than favourable light.

To: Lucky Charm who wrote (41113)	9/23/1999 2:02:00 PM
From: PCModem	Respond to of 43774

Kristi, thanks for that clarification!!! eom

To: Lucky Charm who wrote (41113)	9/23/1999 2:52:00 PM
From: PCModem	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

Hey Lucky Charm! did you see this?: "...You are biasing the presentation of the story..." I am alternating between laughing and crying! "biasing the presentation of the story" Can you believe j accused someone else of that?!?!?! Personally, I think you are wise to not perpetuate unverified rumors since that could be seen as an attempt to manipulate the stock. Especially since you have made it clear that you don't own the stock but plan to buy when (if) the price drops. For j to try to manipulate you into posting unverifiable rumors just because they are negative, and to do so publicly, is the most profound evidence I've encountered that j is attempting to manipulate this stock's price and that as j god of the j universe j thinks the rules of the real world don't apply to him. j is now trying to get you to violate the SEC's rules. My, oh my, oh my! I guess the fact that j makes up rumors (such as the recent "secret shareholder meeting" j created out of the thin air between his ears) is why it does not occur to him that doing what he wants you to do is not only wrong, but illegal. SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC One of my former employees had a great term for people like j: Drama Queen. GRIN! PCM