Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: unclewest who wrote (30267)	9/23/1999 12:42:00 PM
From: Hepps	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Has anyone else noticed a trend lately? there seems to be a full court press by the (shorts?) Volume of negative posts is way up, and they are willing to argue anything.... Chipzilla is evil... The numbers are wrong.... What happens when they own the market? Ha! what do they do then? Or they argue pins and RIMMs, Like Intel and Sony didn't have a care in the world and invested only because they thought that it had a cool name. The market has been able to react pretty efficiently to previous bad news, but all the recent FUD can't seem to budge this stock. Of course nothing is a lock, but I am seeing more posts from those who will argue about anything just to bring FUD and noise to the tread... some of us are long RMBS, others are obviously short I hope that one of us gains the wisdom to reverse our position before get burned to badly.... Good luck to all

To: unclewest who wrote (30267)	9/23/1999 3:51:00 PM
From: grok	Respond to of 93625

RE: <rambus ceo was recently quoted as saying that rambus has some new telecommunications businesses that remain unannounced. i have found multiple rambus documents doing searches at: texas instruments brocade cypress tektronix what an awesome line up! imo it is just a matter of time until we learn of csco, lucent, motorola, sunw and other bandwidth hungry companies involvement with rambus. unclewest> It could be, Uncle, but I have no particular insight here. Of course, networking equipment uses microprocessors and microprocessors use memory so ... I would suggest, however, keeping the difference between network bandwidth and microprocessor memory bandwidth straight.