Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: D.J.Smyth who wrote (2372)	9/25/1999 6:10:00 PM
From: gdichaz	Respond to of 34857

Darrell: Sadly you have provided no proof whatsoever, you have not cited a single source, or even been specific in your facts, nothing. Chaz

To: D.J.Smyth who wrote (2372)	9/25/1999 6:18:00 PM
From: brian h	Respond to of 34857

Darrell, The more you wrote, the more people will distant themselves from IDC. Please save yourself some efforts. And the more you wrote, the more I am sure your did get your MIT. :-) Brian H.

To: D.J.Smyth who wrote (2372)	9/25/1999 8:23:00 PM
From: Peter J Hudson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34857

Darrel and your brother Darrel, When I referred to your post being outrageous it was because of statements like this. >>However, GSM/TDMA buildouts are still 1/2 the cost. If you have a TOTAL mobile user population, of say, 5000 for a given area, and you, the operator has the option of choosing bw CDMA and GSM/TDMA, you'll most likely choose the less costly system per user as the population of users is known - the population count won't change for the forseeable future (ten years). << This model assumes no subscriber growth and no population growth for ten years. That's a very interesting market. Please provide the source for your build out cost GSM being half the cost of CDMA. I'm still interested in what brokerage firm you work for. Pete