Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Process Boy who wrote (73209)	9/27/1999 2:03:00 AM
From: Charles R	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578699

PB, Here is the review from Sharky's. I find this more biased than usual but that should help us get very close to what Intel's own benchmarks will show. sharkyextreme.com Chuck P.S.: Note the part about how Intel is influencing ZDNet for Year 2000 benchmarks. One of the previlages of being an industry powerhouse....

To: Process Boy who wrote (73209)	9/27/1999 7:03:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578699

PB - RE: "I know you've been quizzed on this before recently, but would you care to clarify what segment, and what the the % of this segment vs. WW overall, just to put some perspective into your statistic?" Why should I look at the overall market share statistic when AMD chips aren't even sold in the majority of the market? If AMD had design wins for business oriented notebooks (I'm not talking small business, I'm talking the big expensive ones IBM, Compaq, and Toshiba sell) , I would care. It is like comparing Ferrari's market share of over $100K sports cars to its overall world market share. "I may not disagree with you here, but technically, the "launch" doesn't happen for a few more hours yet." The day is over, so how many companies announced PIIIB systems?