SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AMD/INTC/RMBS et ALL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: grok who wrote (143)9/30/1999 1:33:00 AM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 271
 
Re that discontinuity module... Take the idea a step further. Provide "discontinuity RIMMs": RIMMs with memory, but that include the termination resistors, and would have to be put in the last slot. (i.e. slot 2?)

What a bag!

The thing they really need to do is to figure out how the problem got past the simulations and testing.

-- Carl



To: grok who wrote (143)9/30/1999 12:19:00 PM
From: kash johal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 271
 
Kznerd,

Re: Continuity module.

I had read somewhere that unpopulated RIMM sockets required such a module anyway.

I doubt if any rework will work.

I expect that millions of 2 RIMM boards are in risk production as we speak, while validation testing occurs.

Does anybody know what leadt-times would be for such boards.

My guess is that with Intels money they should be able to manufacture and stuff a board in 3-4 weeks.

regards,

kash


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News