Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zoltan! who wrote (61218)	9/30/1999 12:57:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Respond to of 67261

>...but you shouldn't tar the other 49 that voted courageously in the face of a hostile press.< Indeed. Nevertheless again, senate Republicans appeared generally uncommitted to the removal of Clinton, while senate Democrats appeared remarkably committed to keeping him. Many of them, especially Trent Lott, should certainly be tarred without regard for their vote, for the manner in which they allowed themselves to be hamstrung by the Democrats. House prosecutors pressed admirably against Clinton, but they had to contend with the wimpiness of their own Republican leadership to do it. >Those spineless 6 are the remnants of the "Rockefeller" Republicans and remain a fifth column w/in the party. You can look on the bright side, before Reagan they were a majority of Republicans - which is why the Reps were a minority.< Yes. I nevertheless find it difficult to believe Democrats are able to persistently rally so firmly behind obvious corruption, while The Spineless 6 consistently manage to weaken Republican resolve to do the right thing.