Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The New Iomega '2000' Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ben Antanaitis who wrote (2987)	9/30/1999 4:04:00 PM
From: Gottfried	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5023

Ben, how? "Look how clever I am, I got IOM"? Gottfried [end]

To: Ben Antanaitis who wrote (2987)	9/30/1999 5:34:00 PM
From: John Solder	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5023

window dressing usually involves selling laggers and loading up on big stable names. How does IOM fit into this ? If MM were selling we would see a drop. It must be Rockers covering. I'm waiting for Gilligan to magically appear and tell us how much money he has already made on this POS in a "suckers rally" A rising tide raises all ships, including IOM.

To: Ben Antanaitis who wrote (2987)	9/30/1999 6:56:00 PM
From: Mel Boreham	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5023

Ben, I think you are right about the activity in IOM today. No news, just hedge funds closing out part of their short positions and some new buys by other long funds who are bargain shopping at the end of the quarter (should look good when IOM makes a run around Comdex time, just in time for the same funds to sell and establish their 100% profits that they can crow about in their next quarterly statement to shareholders. We'll see if the activity will carry into trading tomorrow. Who knows, maybe there is some news coming... but I'm not counting on it. But what the heck 10% is 10%, not a bad day for the long holders and newbie buyers who got in earlier in the week. Mel