SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (79244)9/30/1999 11:29:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
So it sounds like no deal until they twist Cox's arm, but I believe that has
to happen eventually because every month yhoo and aol move ahead of the also-ran portals, a new network now is
too ambitious given the infrastructure challenges. Thats my sense anyway.


This makes sense and I would agree.

Glenn



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (79244)10/1/1999 12:41:00 AM
From: 10K a day  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
I believe that has to happen eventually because every month yhoo and aol move ahead of the also-ran portals, a new network now is too ambitious given the infrastructure challenges. Thats my sense anyway>>>

Hi Michelle, I agree,,,I think,,,,BUT...
I maintain my position that AOL is in no hurry
as Cable Rollout is a Snail's pace.

Cable Companies Growing Pains are Not AOL's Problem.
AOL paid their dues in that respect.



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (79244)10/1/1999 5:02:00 AM
From: dbblg  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
>>Several Wall Street analysts said Thursday they were convinced it was only a matter of time before a deal on high-speed Internet
access would be worked out between AT&T, ExciteAtHome and AOL.

T and AOL will definitely sort out their differences. I'm just not sure ATHM will benefit from the resolution.

Incidentally, I am expecting AOL to announce partnerships with Euro and UK telcos sometime soon.