Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mad2 who wrote (4091)	10/2/1999 1:37:00 AM
From: Mike M	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10293

You aren't very smart either mad.....Really foolish comment considering I came to this thread before Dan and Howard. You invented small mindedness and ought to recognize it. If you can't make denigrating comments then you have absolutely nothing to say. What a joke that you of all people would be accusing anyone of being a lap dog....A man, using the term loosely, without a single original thought.

To: Mad2 who wrote (4091)	10/2/1999 11:59:00 AM
From: Hank	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Maybe he should start his own thread. He can call it The Mikey Mouse Club. (Music begins) "Who's the leader of the shill's that's made for you and me?" M-I-K-E-Y M-O-U-S-E Mikey Mouse! Mikey Mouse! Then all the Mousketeers would chime in: "I'm Danny!" "I'm Howie!" etc. Then all the Mousketeers would group together and shout shill slogans while marching place.

To: Mad2 who wrote (4091)	10/2/1999 12:21:00 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Mike's right about one thing; his presence here has nothing to do with Dan or Doc Epstein or GUMM. He's just here out of some need (whose origins I cannot recall) to prove Bill wrong about something. The GUMMers are just allies of convenience for him. Mike's m.o. is to latch onto any organized attack against Bill and hope they end up proven right. Too bad for him that the more organized and/or persistent the effort against Bill, the more likely that Bill is spot on.