Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Air Canada is taking off? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Luke12_15 who wrote (886)	10/3/1999 1:15:00 PM
From: jim	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1033

That says it all, no need to discuss further, I'm happy to vote no and wait.

To: Luke12_15 who wrote (886)	10/4/1999 8:20:00 AM
From: Alomex	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1033

If we vote no to Onex then what do think will happen?????? What do you think will happen to CA??????? The government will come to their rescue once more, by lowering foreign owenership restrictions or other such similar action in order to save precious jobs in the west. What do you think will happen to AC's market share??????? It will stay the same, while it will have to go on competing with subsidized CA. If CA was any other company, I would suggest rejecting the offer and letting it go bankrupt. But what you and the other animated opposers of the bid forget is that the government has decided that CA cannot be allowed to fold. They suspended the competition rules just for that purpose! Do try to remember that it is CA who is going under. That is exactly the mistake I was talking about. The government has stood on its head just not to let CA go under, yet you are assuming they will.