Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: H James Morris who wrote (79470)	10/3/1999 7:11:00 PM
From: re3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

yeah yeah James, more importantly , YOUR hockey team lost last night... the boys in blue and white rule... ike

To: H James Morris who wrote (79470)	10/3/1999 8:36:00 PM
From: GST	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 164684

H James -- when a guy like Blodget says what Blodget was reported to have said on Friday -- i.e. that most people should not own net stocks at all, that those individuals who choose to risk their money and own net stocks should do so by holding 20 stocks to minimize their exposure to any one stock to a fraction of 1% of their portfolio and to minimize their total exposure to a small percentage of their portfolio, and that the most net stocks could go down by 75% from here and still be hugely overpriced, and, my favorite, that net stocks are at the end of their big move up -- when a guy like Blodget can say all that, and yet the bulls on this thread can say with a straight face that he intended his remarks to be understood as a buy recommendation on the 'leading' net stocks -- LOL, ROFLMAO, <g>, <vbg>, <VVVBG>, HAHAHAHAHA, :))))) -- well what is there left to say, but -- have they lived on other worlds before?