Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kolo55 who wrote (15000)	10/4/1999 6:48:00 PM
From: MGV	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Add "petty" to the long (and growing) list of character flaws you manifest. "It is not "ALL right there". This is just another of your lies."

To: kolo55 who wrote (15000)	10/4/1999 6:55:00 PM
From: MGV	Respond to of 27311

"You said we exchanged those posts in August and September (this was AFTER the big spike drop down in CKFR). We actually started talking about CKFR in June, and you were in it BEFORE the 10 point drop in August to the low teens." Look at the dates of the posts for which you whined. (Hint - they are in a mointh beginning with "A," and not "J" as you said. In the future try to present more challenging lies, if you insist on lying.

To: kolo55 who wrote (15000)	10/4/1999 6:59:00 PM
From: MGV	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

"I outlined discussions I had with company officials and money managers at the Robertson Stephens conference in San Francisco. I explained the big concerns money managers had with the Microsoft threat." Well this is slightly more challenging because you cite a source that cannot be revealed (an alleged old PM) BUT it too, alas, is easily shot down. If in fact you had conversations with Robbie Stephens "money managers," both you and they were wrong. The issue with CKFR was not MSFT competition via Transpoint but rather foot dragging by banks in implementing BPPP applications.