Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greg nus who wrote (73891)	10/4/1999 11:38:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572570

Greg, He has travelled to the holy of holies to receive a sermon from on high. After he has been dully instructed he will return. The worst weeds have the deepest roots. Bill

To: greg nus who wrote (73891)	10/5/1999 2:03:00 AM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572570

Real Bad Nus - Re: "Amd'ers Notice how Paul disapears when his wisdom of owning Intel stock is in question. I guess he's got his tail tucked high between his legs in hiding, ashamed to show his pen on the AMD thread, from the intlectual fallout of of 10/3/99 Barrons article. Barrons even questioned the varasity of Barrett, implying "He's no Grove". How will Paul carry on knowing his hero's Barrett charactor has been mortaly wounded by tripping on a financial tabloid tossed across the door steps of Wall Street, American Investment Institutions, and yes no less the American investing public. " I think you are the ONLY FOOL that doesn't realize that Intel's stock ROSE $2 1/16 on the first trading day following the publication of the Bearon's article. I knew you were foolish, Bad Nus - but I never figured you for a complete fool. Guess I over-estimated you ! Paul