Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ColleenB who wrote (41414)	10/5/1999 11:13:00 AM
From: Fred C. Dobbs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

So lets try to figure this out now, Message 11439722 <And I think jdcpa, Barbara Sperino, Raffie, Helene, Sirk, Silver, Roasrio, McDuck, FreddyC, Scottoo, Roger, wlnyc, issme, Standfast, JT, Legalboy, kevinl, emilg, PCM, the Kruses and many others should make the list of pumpers here as well.> So there must be proof of this group posting bogus news. Kind of like this. Message 6193811 Which could lead investors to believe, Message 6200806 <I want "y'all" to realize and see what a terrific team we have on PRWT...> So in other words, a pumpers job is to hype a stock to run it up, sell, then bash it, to drive it down and then start the cycle again. Where is your role in all this? Credibility is oh so important don't you think? TTFN

To: ColleenB who wrote (41414)	10/5/1999 11:14:00 AM
From: J T	Respond to of 43774

Getting selective now in your cut & pastes colleen? "But according to your better half j and his list, anyone that was in, excited about, or posted on the PABN thread was a pumper." You would have to leave the highlighted part out for your post to "work" now wouldn't you! "Well ronnie, you exaggerate as usual." I don't agree with you colleen.(well now isn't that a surprise) As far as I can remember I have never seen j not question someone's "intentions" that was "pro" the stock. You know his little comments like "Aw another "sheep" to the flock" ect would soon follow any positive poster here, so yes that post could be taken as just what it was taken for, an IMPLIED comment that ANYONE "pro" the stock are pumping it. According to j & his list and his "witty" INSINUATIONS after the list pretty much show no exaggeration on anyone's part OTHER than yours and j. "Why don't you show us where jhild makes such a claim." " and many others should make the list of pumpers here as well." Then comes the INSINUATIONS "I would be more than happy to help the SEC develop a list." (of birthdays,holidays?) (To bad he wouldn't though.Because if he did he would have to put his star pupil at the TOP of the list along with her brother.) "PS: If any feel unnecessarily left off this list, it is really only off the top of my head. Feel free to step up and add your name if you want to be included." Then his advice for the "implied guilty" to cleanse their souls.(was a good touch if you ask me) " Confession is good for the soul."