SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Anthony@Pacific Member Vote -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Daniel Miller who wrote (4)10/5/1999 7:41:00 PM
From: Tim Luke  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1638
 
YES



To: Daniel Miller who wrote (4)10/5/1999 7:46:00 PM
From: LPS5  Respond to of 1638
 
YES



To: Daniel Miller who wrote (4)10/5/1999 7:48:00 PM
From: who cares?  Respond to of 1638
 
Haven't you got some Pokemon cards you could be playing with, or hanging out at the local Qwick-E-Mart drinking Squishies or heaven forfend you have homework.

Mr. Burns



To: Daniel Miller who wrote (4)10/5/1999 7:56:00 PM
From: Hoatzin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1638
 
better hope they don't put you to the vote, kid!



To: Daniel Miller who wrote (4)10/5/1999 9:18:00 PM
From: .com  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1638
 
You are absolutely right Daniel, this does seriously undermine SI's credibility.

One must wonder why A@P is so desperate to re-join that he continues to lobby to have his membership re-instated. Plus, this business of creating a new alias to get back in after being booted is also a desperate act.



To: Daniel Miller who wrote (4)10/5/1999 11:03:00 PM
From: Mama Bear  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1638
 
"You need to post your NO vote in his PM box...

I agree with you there.

We need every NO vote to count so get it right.

All YES votes should be posted on the board... No need to PM him
"

A nice demonstration of unethical behavior Daniel. All votes whether yes or no need to be cast by PM in order to count, but you knew that, didn't you?

Barb



To: Daniel Miller who wrote (4)10/6/1999 1:29:00 PM
From: Jeffery Lakeshire  Respond to of 1638
 
YES to Anthony for being a valuable member of SI. His analysis of
stock valuations has been valuable even to his enemies. Why else
would they follow his posts?

JL