SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Anthony@Pacific Member Vote
An SI Board Since October 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1638 24 0
Emcee:  A@P Vote Type:  Unmoderated
Dear Silicon Investor Members:

As many of you know, we recently terminated the membership of Anthony@Pacific for Terms of Use violations. It was an extremely difficult decision, considering Anthony's popularity within the community. As I stated in my original announcement regarding this matter, our dedication to the Silicon Investor community is our prime directive, and the SI Terms of Use have served us well in this regard.

In the past couple weeks, I have received several messages (public and private) regarding Anthony's termination. Many members reinforced our original decision, and I appreciate that support. Several members, however, urgently requested Anthony's return. Those requests typically included one of the following two types of messages:

Type #1 - Bryan, You're a complete moron! Who the hell put you in charge!?!? You'll regret this decision until your dying day.

Type #2 - Bryan, I understand why you did what you did, but I hope you'll reconsider. Anthony has made a meaningful contribution in my life through Silicon Investor, and I don't want that to be lost.

Moron or not, I can sympathize with the folks who sent the second type of message. The question we've been struggling with is, "What's best for the community?" Or, to put it another way, "Is Silicon Investor better off with or without Anthony as a member?" The bottom line is that it's a tough call.

Then, we hit upon a (potentially) brilliant idea: "We can let the community decide!" Of course, this thing could completely backfire in our faces, but we hope not. In any case, to our knowledge, it's never been done before on the Web, and we're always willing to try new things. So, here's the deal.

This thread has been started as an open discussion for members to express opinions and arguments for or against reinstating Anthony@Pacific's membership. Each member may place one vote by sending a Private Message to A@PVote.

<<Click A@P Vote link above to access Private Messaging.>>

Important Note: Only votes sent via PM to the A@PVote profile will be counted, so don't send your votes to me or Jill or Bob.

Your vote PM should simply contain a YES or NO vote:
- YES - If you think Silicon Investor will be better off by letting Anthony back on.
- NO - If you think Silicon Investor is better off without him.

If you want to make a case one way or the other, please make it on this thread.

Neither Go2Net nor Anthony@Pacific will participate in the discussion on this thread, although we will allow Anthony to post one reply to this initial message. We will perform the mechanics of the post for him, since as of now, his termination still stands.

We will accept votes on this matter between October 4 and October 8, 1999. We will tally the votes and post our final decision on Monday, October 11.

We welcome your thoughts and comments on this process. In fact, if this works well, and it's something that members seem to enjoy, then we'll consider a similar "community appeals" process as a part of ongoing Terms of Use enforcement.

Sincerely,

Bryan A. Burdick
Managing Director
Silicon Investor
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1638Love Ya AP and will be here WHEN you return and if these blind moles wont have ytool dude-5/24/2008
1637Hi Daughter.. What's UP?!!! :-)c.horn-11/16/2006
1636Hey dog....whats up! JaneJane4IceCream-11/16/2006
1635I wonder about the fate of another hero from the same indictment, troy peters. hravenseye-10/28/2006
1634Another hero.. news.moneycentral.msn.comc.horn-10/28/2006
1633oh yea one heck of a hero for his wife and kids NOT! 11 years for tony@Federalravenseye-10/28/2006
1632Look Under HERO in U R websterstool dude-10/8/2005
1631Since 1859, The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company Inc. (A&P) has fulfSmiling Bob-5/17/2005
1630Can anyone point me to the story of A@P? Thx CCondor-5/17/2005
1629OT Just checking to see if my sign-on info is correct. DrDDrD-5/19/2004
1628Still LMFAO!!! DJ NASD Appeals SEC Order To Overturn Elgindy Decision By Carolyomaz-5/12/2004
1627Actually, I did not know of A&P's most current trouble with the law whenyomaz-4/26/2004
1626Having known of A&P for over five years that does not suprise me. <IMO&gyomaz-4/26/2004
1625Just watching his internet antics for several years, I've seen Amr exploit hSmiling Bob-4/26/2004
1624That was AP's MO, so he gets a taste of his own medicine, and much more righSmiling Bob-4/26/2004
1623Hey I'm no defender of the imprisoned but what good does it do to kick someoJane4IceCream-4/25/2004
1622How's the US Government treating you lately A&P??.. LMFAO!!!...yomaz-4/25/2004
1621Why do you feel that he or anyone else should answer your questions...........maMongo2116-9/13/2003
1620As long as you continue to make a cowardly ass out of yourself on SI, that'syomaz-9/12/2003
1619I like you here...with all 41 others watching. Bahhahaahahaa..ciao monkeyboyAnthony@Pacific-9/12/2003
1618It's a Message Board brainchild everyone is hiding behind an alias. Have I yomaz-9/12/2003
1617Fack off you are the coward hiding behind an alias..piss-antAnthony@Pacific-9/12/2003
1616As long as you know you are a coward.. My job is done...yomaz-9/12/2003
1615This thread has a whopping 43 bookmarks,,rant away turd boy...opps make it 42 noAnthony@Pacific-9/12/2003
1614A&P, You really are a spineless coward...yomaz-9/12/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):