SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Anthony@Pacific Member Vote -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Don Pueblo who wrote (175)10/6/1999 1:35:00 AM
From: Cisco  Respond to of 1638
 
Did I miss something or does a guru have special rights on SI?

I wonder if they pay extra for those special rights?



To: Don Pueblo who wrote (175)10/6/1999 2:10:00 AM
From: BG Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1638
 
"That's why we have the friggin' rules."
Agreed.
However, please consider that "the friggin' rules" are sometimes not enforced in anything resembling a consistent fashion.

Your argument (as I understand it) would support the expulsion of any and all who have crossed any line as laid out in the TOU. But too many are still here today with multiple and serious past infractions.

Again, I ask, how is SI richer or "better off" without him?



To: Don Pueblo who wrote (175)10/6/1999 8:47:00 AM
From: HairBall  Respond to of 1638
 
TLC: If you break the rules, no matter how many people think you are God's Gift to Silicon Investor, then you are friggin' gone.

Amen...

This suspension should have remained private between SI and Tony, period. Of course SI management could not stop the "groupies" from wailing, regardless it should have remained private. Then, if SI management decided to bring Anthony back, it would have been management's decision.

Obviously they do not have the balls to either stand by their suspension decision or reverse and bring Tony back. So, now we have this farce of a vote. SI management has ZERO credibility NOW.

I am thoroughly disgusted.

Regards,
LG