To: Bill Jackson who wrote (42247 ) 10/6/1999 1:53:00 PM From: IngotWeTrust Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116762
Hi, Bill. Thank you for that URL. I've been following this "Sue and Labor" legal reparations strategy between attorny's and insurance companies for about 3 weeks now. A few comments if I may:1) This Sue and Labor strategy is based upon an old 1600's maritime law principle as best I understand it. 2) When Ken Salaets and Ron Reece were strutting around on various threads about oh, 2-3 months ago talking about all Prevent Y2K Lawsuits via legislated remedies being voted on in our local "Congress" before one actually passed, ...I knew in my GUT that legislation schtick was going tooooo smoothly, and that there was an ace up the sleeve of the legal profession who wasn't putting up much of a struggle. One of Ken's more fun points about the legislation that DID pass is that if it passed, it would restrict the legal fees authorized as collectible in said lawsuits that might slip through to a per hour of $1,000. When I read that from Lobbyist Salaets, I decided then and there that this was going to be a toothless, clawless tiger law and that something else had to be afoot. I mean, let's get real, Bill. When did you ever hear of a bunch of attorney's which are about all we have in Congress willingly vote to limit another attorney's legal fees? That is about the stupidest thing I'd heard in a long time from our silly sacred seers we send up there to "do our bidness"3) The suits w/briefcases and legal pads attending Y2K seminars acc'd to various presenters, not the least of which was SI's own C.K. Houston, was not diminishing as the ability to sue was supposedly curtailed by said new law passed by Congress and lauded by Clinton. That told me that there was another strategy under construction, which was going to be revealed in the fullness of time.4) I caught a CNBC snippet re: GTE's Sue and Labor lawsuit filing on CNBC, last Friday after Markets Closed, I believe it was. I don't visit CNBC's website like maybe I should, (mining is far more fun!!!<g>) but maybe the transcript of that soundbyte is available there for your perusal if you are interested.THE THING THAT STARTLED ME in you proferred UK url is this: MICRO-Y2K-SCOFF (OTC: MSFT) is one of the PLAINTIFFS in a Sue and Labor already FILED case!!!! NOW THAT IS RIVETTING INFORMATION, and I have you to thank for bringing it to my attention. In my mind, the published fact that MSFT has filed as a plaintiff in this Y2K lawsuit, has many revealing Y2K reality checks! Some that come to mind are: 1) Y2K is a REEEEEEAL Problem and MSFT is admitting it, at least in court!!!! 1-A) Y2K bug exists, and it is bigggggg 2-B) Y2K bug is extremely expensive to fix 3-C) wants insurance company reimbursement 4-D) initiated legal action prior to Y2K's fatal midnight deadline 5-E) initiated Sue and Labor legal action in the MIDST OF THEIR OWN REMEDIATION AND REPLACEMENT AND TESTING CYCLE!!!! For those of you who wonder how I arrived at that last conclusion, please consider this: 5-E.1) There is NO WAY IN HELL this Sue&Labor action will be settled prior to Y2K deadline 5-E.2) There is NO WAY they have a "final damages/reparations figure" in concrete in this filling, because the Y2K work is NOT COMPLETED 5-E.3) It is a brilliant vaccination "argument" in defending future lawsuits by MSFT's CUSTOMERS. I can hear MSFT lawyers whining now: "But, Your Honor, We Got Hurt, Too, so don't pick on MSFT" 5-E.4) Suing insurance companies is ALWAYS a negotiated settlement. And these negotiations will be ongoing for many decades. Fortunately for MSFT shareholders, Bill is a young man with a lot of years left on him, supposedly, and all of them POST Y2K. Of course, this is an unfortunate aspect from the insurers viewpoint. Thanks again, Bill. Looking forward to all future posts by you. BTW, did you see the little goldmining company website I built for some friends while I was on Y2K relocating hiatus from SI? Click oregontrail.net and drop Pat and Roy a line if you have any thoughts you'd like to share with them on their First Commercial Mining Companyon the Internet cyberventure!!! I'll tell them to expect a friendly e*mail from you, so they'll know who you are when it arrives. Relax, my friend, it will ALL be friendly!<vvbg> O/49r