SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Voltaire who wrote (265)10/6/1999 4:55:00 PM
From: Jim Willie CB  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 35685
 
Sir Voltage,
207 served as target for the shorterm alright, with overshoot
but we held over 5/8 of the gain today, the ubiquitous 3/8 and 5/8

need a closer look at the TA meters
clearly techs are leading this parade
Q nowhere near overbought
Q did only slightly better than S&P
so RSI looks healthy, not overly strong, allowing room to run
need more time to digest today's numerical evidence

busy boy today, my PC monitor popped broken in front of my eyes
sounded like crushed aluminum foil and shattered glass

WE NEED BONDS TO RALLY
THEY ARE TIMID AND WATCHING THE FED OVER THEIR SHOULDERS
but a rally is building, just like you expected this week

news from Q will provide fundy impetus very soon
a certain individual on Qthread needs some horizontal carnal yayas
what an incredible pain, he is!!

more scribbles later, jim



To: Voltaire who wrote (265)10/6/1999 8:57:00 PM
From: Poet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35685
 
Hey V, now that we've all had a few hours to celebrate both GMST's and QCOM's turns, I wonder if you would do me the favor of posting your thoughts on RNWK, which I know is a favorite of yours. I noticed it remains kinda stuck in a trading range.

A new and faithful devotee. <GG>