Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Anthony@Pacific Member Vote -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cisco who wrote (714)	10/8/1999 5:34:00 PM
From: Cheeky Kid	Respond to of 1638

When you work for a company like a brokerage firm, you have strict rules to follow and are regulated. When you are a private investor, it's a different ball game. At least its that way in Canada.

To: Cisco who wrote (714)	10/8/1999 5:44:00 PM
From: micky	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1638

Tony didn't "chose" to leave, he was booted by the NASD - see my prior post #674 with the NASD citation. Mucho clouds over Amr's head... WSJ doing alot of investigating... Good investing

To: Cisco who wrote (714)	10/9/1999 12:54:00 AM
From: A@P Trader	Respond to of 1638

He left the NASD Private Boys Club, because in May 1997, he was in interviewed by Brian Ross on ABC's 20/20 about Wall street and his insights on Organized crime on wall Street , (transcript is available somewhere on the net ) , and he accused the NASD of always looking the other way when it involved The BIG FIRMS on Wall STreet, he had tape recordings and all kinds of supporting eveidence, as well as documented Death Threats, for his "scambusting" work. The NASD refused to appear on camera to address these allegations. Since he had now turned the aim of his metaphoric sights on the NASD, he decided he couldnt possibly be a part of the worlds most corrupt Private Company.