Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Anthony@Pacific Member Vote -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gator who wrote (782)	10/9/1999 3:00:00 PM
From: C.Carlos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1638

Well, I would have voted no, but I just found out about the vote today. I guess management just wanted to include the AP friends in this vote, or maybe it was just my misfortune. If he is "voted" back in, then let democracy win. Speaking about democracy, many allege that Anthony Elgindy is a self serving trader who manipulates the stocks he trades in, judging by his intervention in the case of Starnet Communications, where he was predicting the raid before it happened. I wonder how he knew that Department of Justice action was going to take place? Isn't that a coincidence?

To: Gator who wrote (782)	10/9/1999 5:53:00 PM
From: MaryinRed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1638

Well Gator...so you know...one of A@P's members (ME!) did what I could to get the word out..by posting it.on 19 boards.. ...and was spanked for spamming...so they were all deleted.... ...I think I was reported by those opposed...actually to his returning...lol.... so...no....the shorters were not trying to keep it a secret....and every person who send me a PM and said...they were voting "NO!"...I told them to tell their friends....to vote. That is not a sign...that I was trying to "swing the vote" Anthony's way... smile...Mary (calling a recount...already??????)