Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Anthony@Pacific Member Vote -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: A@P Trader who wrote (875)	10/9/1999 11:34:00 PM
From: Daniel Miller	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1638

I have never spoken to the SEC about anything wrong with what I am doing... Ztect told me: These statements of his are complete *** "...ZTECT , same thing gone forever, for making harrassing and lewd calls to Anthony's wife...." "...I was under the impression he was some kind of pervert as well.." Remind him about what a hypocrite he is for posting libelous statements about people that can't defend themselves. He also said he never had a court case about any lewd comments to A@P wife. He said he never made any either... Explain...

To: A@P Trader who wrote (875)	10/10/1999 12:20:00 AM
From: Daniel Miller	Respond to of 1638

He was also sued In Federal Court By A@P, which was a huge success. Dont know all the details, But I do know that His phone calls to A@P's wife were all taped and they were nasty and lewd, A real low-life. Also, are there any lawyers on this thread? Isn't Ztect protected by freedom of speech if this imaginary case ever happened? I doubt that A@P would win a case about freedom of Speech, or maybe the courts over-rule the consitution for A@P too? So does anyone have any reason to believe that A@P trader is telling the truth? Also the way A@P trader has been talking he seems as though he is the one representing A@P to the board so is there any reason to believe A@P here? I want answers...