To: J F Allen who wrote (89778 ) 10/10/1999 2:41:00 AM From: Amy J Respond to of 186894
JF Allen and thread, RE: "which challenged their business model due to lack of network ownership. I was wondering why this might not apply to Intel's entry into the web hosting /server farm business. tia and sorry to digress from AMD bashing.[g]" ----------------------------------------------- It does apply. I haven't read the article, but I've wondered about this: How can Intel compete on costs when, I understand, its competitor has burden-free use of the network by way of early-created marketing relationships? Anyone know how Intel can compete with this? How is Intel going to get these types of relationships? If Intel doesn't get this, then it appears on the surface they will be at a disadvantage. I don't understand how Intel can compete (on pricing) when encumbered with these extra costs their competitor doesn't have. And if this is a price sensitive business, well, being encumbered with costs their competitor doesn't have, concerns me. I don't know the webhosting/server farm business. I'm hoping someone can explain this? Specifically, there must be some strategy here which I am not seeing - there must be some advantage - like maybe top-tier service offering or maybe cost savings on the building of the operations (which maybe their competitor doesn't have?), some advantage must exist. Maybe the advantage is in Intel's potential ability to build the operations less costly? But, if operating the business is more costly than building the operation, this would imply Intel's competitor (who is not encumbered on network costs) possibly could have the advantage? As you can see, I'm making some wild guesses here. I don't understand what Intel's advantage is in this business area. I'm hoping someone on the thread can explain this business area. Regards, Amy J