Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Anthony@Pacific Member Vote -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Miller who wrote (1102)	10/10/1999 1:50:00 PM
From: eims2000	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1638

Daniel, I really beleive that A@P DID pursue legal action against ztect. If I am wrong then yes it would be a point against A@P, but not for ztect, I remember ztect's posts on these threads and if you did then we wouldn't even be having this discussion. This discussion started about why you thought that if A@P was allowed back on then so should ztect. I stated that there was a difference because legal action (I beleive) had to be pursued in ztect's case. Now I am wondering if you will be man enough to appoligize if A@P did indeed pursue legal action against ztect.