SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Knight/Trimark Group, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gary Korn who wrote (4895)10/11/1999 11:52:00 PM
From: sepku  Respond to of 10027
 
fyi from ii.

David Peltier (10/11/99)

Knight/Trimark (NASDAQ: NITE - Quotes, News, Boards) made it official this morning -- the third quarter is going to fall well short of expectations. The market maker warned that its quarterly profit will be between $0.17 per share and $0.19 versus the already-reduced consensus estimate of $0.30 per share.

CEO Kenneth Pasternak stated 'there were decreased trading volumes and greater than expected seasonality in the marketplace.' Internet trading was down 5% to 10% for the third quarter, and Knight receives approximately 40% of its business from online brokers.
Like this Article?

Analyst Sean Chin of Merrill Lynch cut his near-term rating on Knight/Trimark to 'neutral', while maintaining a long-term 'buy' recommendation on the stock.

Despite the enormous shortfall, Knight is expected to report revenue of $138 million, 49% better than the prior year. Profits will also show a greater than 40% increase. These numbers pale in comparison to prior quarters however, where 200%-plus growth was achieved when the markets were soaring.

We recommended Knight/Trimark at $52 per share -- 36% off its highs. At the time it was thought that the company could stand tall against further selling in the e-brokerage industry. Today however, you can buy those same shares for $25.56, after today's 15% drop.

There were a few reasons why Knight's stock has persistently sold off. The most obvious has been the market maker's association with online brokers, who own about 20% of the company and still account for about 40% of its transactions.

Charles Schwab (NYSE: SCH - Quotes, News, Boards), Ameritrade (NASDAQ: AMTD - Quotes, News, Boards) and E*Trade (NASDAQ: EGRP - Quotes, News, Boards) were all cut by more than 50% over the summer. Many investors claimed that summer volume was just seasonably light and would pick up in the fall. Well, a few rate hikes later, trading volume and volatility have yet to pick up from the summer.

As a market maker Knight/Trimark thrives on market volatility, especially as trading volume increases. The company makes the bid/ask spread by fronting its own capital to execute trades on the market.

When Knight went public last year, about 60% of the shares were owned by Knight management and the online brokers that first created Knight. There was a one-year lockup period in which these 'insiders' could not sell their shares. Even given the stock's turbulent ride, shares are up over 300% from their IPO price.

Insider profit-taking was inevitable, but the brokers especially have unloaded a good amount of shares. Don't be too worried though, these brokers have $1 billion in advertising to pay for, and management still owns a significant 29% of the shares outstanding.

While Knight's stock price has fallen drastically, its strategy and fundamentals remain strong -- in fact, we think that they've gotten even brighter.

In July the company took a 19% stake in the EASDAQ, a European market system similar to our domestic Nasdaq. While the $8 million investment is small, Knight and its partners (including Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter) are positioned to coagulate a highly segmented market. The investment could be extremely lucrative for Knight, which already has a European presence with its London office.

Knight has also switched over to use Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER - Quotes, News, Boards) for the clearing of its trades. Knight management said that the deal would save the company 6 cents a share for each trade it makes. Given the company's current volume, this will add 4 cents a share to the bottom line each year.

Knight's third quarter results will hamper the stock's performance for the rest of the year. A lot of investors have by now realized the company's long-term potential, as chronicled on our message boards.

In its short existence and meteoric rise to $81 per share it has rarely known slow times, and people want to see how much leverage Knight's business model can squeeze out of sequentially lower trading volumes. Investors will be looking to the earnings reports from online brokers such as Schwab and E*Trade due later this week, to see how well they handled the slow quarter.

Eight out of nine analysts continue to rate Knight a long-term buy, and published 12-month price targets range anywhere from $58 to $98.

Charlotte Chamberlain of Jefferies & Co. told us that Knight 'is the best buy in the e-brokerage sector-- the company is already profitable.” As for the online broker/owners selling, she assured us that they have no reason to look elsewhere for their trade execution.

With over $250 million in cash and no debt on its balance sheet, look for Knight to be making some more acquisitions -- possibly kick-starting the company's desire to start an options exchange.

At $25.56, Knight/Trimark is trading at a mere 19.7 times the Street's fiscal 1999 earnings per share estimate of $1.30 per share. Knight is trading at a gross discount to its earnings potential, considering management said that the company will continue to post at least 30% growth year-over-year.

After it clears the hurdle of its third quarter earnings, the road ahead looks very clear for Knight.

Bottom Line:

Market volume has been anemic, but isn't dead. Knight/Trimark is the largest and most efficient market maker and its recent strategic moves have made the company less dependent on its online trade clearing. The company will prove in the following quarters that its business model will succeed even in slow times.




To: Gary Korn who wrote (4895)10/12/1999 7:53:00 AM
From: gbh  Respond to of 10027
 
Another article with NITE references. Note the statement that says "payment for order flow is going away". Is this correct.

TD Waterhouse May Pull Its Stake in
Island
By Caroline Humer
Staff Reporter
10/12/99 7:00 AM ET

Conventional wisdom holds that Wall Street can't get enough
of electronic trading systems.

Nearly every month brings some new deal between
brokerages, ranging from newfangled cyber types like
E*Trade (EGRP:Nasdaq) to traditional players like Merrill
Lynch (MER:NYSE), and electronic trading systems. The
brokers figure they have little choice but to jump into
electronic trading because it's ushering in huge changes in
the market, like after-hours trading for the retail crowd.

But now it seems that even if some online traders like a good
gamble, not all brokerages do.

TD Waterhouse (TWE:NYSE) may be the one that bucks the
trend by pulling out of a proposed deal to take a 12.5% stake
in Island, an electronic communications network
majority-owned by Datek Online Holdings, leaving it with no
investment in an electronic platform. Four months after the
two firms first agreed to the deal, Datek says it may not go
through, and TD Waterhouse declines to discuss it. A
statement from TD Waterhouse is expected this week.

TD Waterhouse still is working on technical links with Island
and is sending orders there, according to one person familiar
with the discussions. And Stephen McDonald, who heads TD
Waterhouse, recently told Bloomberg that having such a link
to an ECN was enough.

But without a stake in an electronic trading platform, TD
Waterhouse could find itself behind competitors like Charles
Schwab (SCH:NYSE), which has a stake in ECN REDIbook.
Investors already have beaten up on Waterhouse stock,
pushing it down more than 50% since mid-July. Schwab, by
comparison, has fallen about 36% and E*Trade has dropped
just under 30%. Investors are worried in part about falling
trading volumes among online brokers.

For Island, TD Waterhouse could provide order flow given its
place as the third-biggest online broker. "The important thing
for us is getting orders," says Matt Andresen, Island's
president.

Electronic trading systems -- which match buy and sell orders
through computers -- have become hot in part because of
online trading and growing interest in after-hours trading. For
online brokerages, creating links to these ECNs will allow
them to execute trades quickly during the regular session and
during after-hours trading. It also could create a new revenue
stream.


For example, TD Waterhouse's average daily share volume in
the third quarter ended July was 109,000, more than Island's
average daily volume. That liquidity is important because while
ECNs can be accessed through Nasdaq's SelectNet system
or direct links, profits increase when they match orders
in-house. Unlike Nasdaq market makers, which make their
money on the spread (or the difference between the bid and
the ask), ECNs charge a commission on each share.


James Punishill, an analyst for Boston-based Forrester
Research, says TD Waterhouse is "leaving a lot of money on
the table" if it doesn't invest in an ECN. Changing revenue
models makes diversification a pressing issue for online
brokerages, Punishill explains.

"Payment for order flow is going down. It's going away. We all
know it's going away," he says.
"There's a little commission
war heating up again. Competition is heating up with the
full-service firms entering. [Brokers] have to find new sources
of revenue."

Which brings the question back to why TD Waterhouse would
pull out of the Island deal.

For one thing, there's money. Although TD Waterhouse raised
$1 billion in its June IPO and recently sold about $200 million
worth of stock in market maker Knight/Trimark
(OUCH)
(NITE:Nasdaq), the person with knowledge of the agreement
says Island's valuation -- $25 million for the 12.5% stake --
became a point of contention.

And there's the history of regulatory problems at Datek. Last
week, its founder and head honcho Jeffrey Citron stepped
down to make way for Ed Nicoll, a move seen as an attempt
to distance the firm from a troubled past that scared investors,
including Paul Allen's Vulcan Ventures, which pulled out of a
financing agreement for Datek and Island in July.

Then there's the management situation. Nicoll, who moved to
Datek in January, was a Waterhouse founder and spent more
than a decade there. In March, he brought over another
Waterhouse manager, John Mullin, in a move to shore up
management. The deal between Island and Waterhouse was
announced a couple of months later.

During that same time period, Waterhouse became TD
Waterhouse and McDonald came down from Canada, home of
majority owner Toronto Dominion (TD:NYSE), to replace
Waterhouse's Frank Petrilli at the brokerage's helm. Petrilli
then left TD Waterhouse in July for E*Trade but returned after
a week there.

Petrilli may have found the differences between the
brokerages wider than anticipated, but TD Waterhouse has
resembled E*Trade and other brokerages in the past,
including by having taken part in their bet on order-execution
systems. For example, E*Trade, Ameritrade
(AMTD:Nasdaq), TD Waterhouse and others invested as a
consortium in 1995 in Knight/Trimark, hoping that Nasdaq
trade executions would eventually deliver hefty returns.

When Knight/Trimark went public in 1998, TD Waterhouse
ended up with a winning hand. Now the question is whether
TD Waterhouse is making another smart move by walking
away.



To: Gary Korn who wrote (4895)10/12/1999 8:08:00 AM
From: gbh  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10027
 
I watch CNBC everyday for a half an hour before leaving for work, and I see at least 2 or 3 NITE commercials. Man, I hate these. I know they are trying to raise brand awareness, but why? I hope someone questions this in the CC. I'll state again, they should be spending these ad dollars subsidizing AMTD and EGRP and other order flow brokers, perhaps with a little "NITE Inside" label in the bottom corner. Intel does it and keeps the troops loyal and tied in for fear of losing the subsidy in a razor thin margin business, which th OLBs are becoming.

Gary



To: Gary Korn who wrote (4895)10/12/1999 1:06:00 PM
From: blankmind  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10027
 
although you have posted earnings will be moved up from the 20th to the 13th prior to the market open, i just want to re-post it since it is tomorrow and people might want to rise a bit early.