Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Systems, Strategies and Resources for Trading Futures -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nemer who wrote (36109)	10/12/1999 7:54:00 PM
From: Patrick Slevin	Respond to of 44573

That's the page I looked at this morning, I thought I was going to find a description of the measurement process on the shaft. There have been companies around for about 10 years that worked on consistency in matching graphite club shafts. I did not realize you and Hal were referring to consistency "in a set" of sticks. I thought you meant consistency of the typical shaft. For example, you could presume that the loft on the average PW was 46 degrees. But your set might be a strong set and each club was perhaps scaled a little stronger than average, so the 46 degree wedge might be 45. I see what you mean though.....if your set was strong on some but not others or if they were inconsistently strong on all then there would be a problem I happen to have that problem with a set of Armour Titaniums. My 8 flies a buck 52 on average and my 7 flies a buck 58....my 9 a 143, my PW 120 my SW 85. Totally unuseable....and unbendable because of the alloy. So I had to sub the Wedges out several times until I got a Ping SW to take the 110 yard slot. Now I have to find a PW for the 125 area. The Long Irons are too tight on the other end...the gaps are about 5 yards. So I get the picture, if the torque is inconsistent then the accuracy and consistency of the shot is subject to more slop.