Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Process Boy who wrote (75562)	10/14/1999 10:58:00 PM
From: Dan3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572398

Re: do try to communicate and disclose that Coppermine will scale in raw clock speed.. Hey, I was saying 800MHZ coppermine by Q4 last August, and you were trying to argue me out of it! Message 11093893 :-) Dan

To: Process Boy who wrote (75562)	10/15/1999 12:34:00 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572398

RE <<<Intel exec's have and do try to communicate and disclose that Coppermine will scale in raw clock speed. I will back them up on this. It won't go forever, but it'll certainly not give up the ghost any time soon.>>> It sounds exciting....I looking forward to cumine's debut. BTW I am curious. I keep hearing that to get to 1 G, a chip will need at least copper interconnects...now its come up again with L. Smith from AMD saying the same thing. However, if I remember correctly, you thought copper was not necessary to hit that speed. Can you or anyone else on the thread explain the divergence of opinion on this issue? Thanks.