Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bobby beara who wrote (30109)	10/16/1999 4:04:00 AM
From: Berney	Respond to of 99985

bb, I already did! :o)

To: bobby beara who wrote (30109)	10/16/1999 9:13:00 AM
From: TimbaBear	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 99985

Well, bb, I don't know what it is that you want justification for....what is the question?....should Microsoft (or any company) have a higher market cap than GM?....or is the question should an industrial company with massive capital investment, huge overhead, and vastly lower margins, in an industry that has many serious competitors be valued the same as a technology company with comparatively virtually no capital investment, little overhead, massive margins, and still virtually no competition.....what is the question? Is the question: now that we are in a downdraft can you defend having a bullish outlook and being long in anything?....or just technology?....or just any apparently overvalued company?...Clear up the question for me bobby, and I'll do my best to answer it from my perspective as best I can.