SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Doc Bones who wrote (69167)10/17/1999 8:36:00 AM
From: Tommaso  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Remarking on the A/D line is getting to be an old story, but if this is not a dive signal I don't know what it is:

decisionpoint.com



To: Doc Bones who wrote (69167)10/17/1999 11:30:00 AM
From: Knighty Tin  Respond to of 132070
 
Doc, You are going back a bit. I got my legal jargon confused on that one and it was Incyte that was accused and convicted of ripping off an AFFX process, not the other way around. Actually, despite the fact the immediate ruling was bad for INCY, it may be good longer term, as it upholds the concept that patents can be defended in the genomics area.

So, I got it bass ackwards. I must have been dyslexic when I read it. <g>


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News