Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mark Fowler who wrote (81136)	10/19/1999 12:14:00 PM
From: Bill Harmond	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 164684

HJ critiquing our "lack" of disclosure is a laugh!

To: Mark Fowler who wrote (81136)	10/19/1999 12:54:00 PM
From: H James Morris	Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 164684

>>James i sold Nite and Exds, Rbak and half of my Ebay now you want Faxes too. << Hey Mark, lets have a faxing party.I'll fax my IPO transactions to you. William can fax his Fatb, Ivil to me, and we'll get Kis to fax his to Glenn. BTW do you know faxes are going to be toast in the up coming Millennium, according to Forrester Research? Ps Are you ever going to answer my question? I think you won't because like every other Amzn long in the world. No one wants to touch that question. William is the only one that kinda say's the elephants will stay because of free cash flow. Hey, I have a stock that has done very well its called Viacom. These two stocks have similar histories. Both had huge debt financed by junk, and spent a ton on infrastructure. The question I have is ViaCom is a virtual monoply. Bezos would like to be one too, but that would mean he'd have to buy out Aol,Yhoo,eBay, and all of the other 2000 nit I-retailers. I still think a merger with AOL, and Amzn would be a match made in heaven, especially with them both being Kleiner children.