Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Solucorp Industries (SLUP - OTCBB) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: junglejims who wrote (2756)	10/20/1999 5:17:00 PM
From: hawkeye	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3679

hawkeye is encouraged by the fact that the SEC is reading this thread. hawkeye is informed that a participant on this thread called the SEC's Inspector General's Office to complain about this matter and REQUESTED THAT THEY READ HAWKEYE'S POSTS REGARDING THIS MATTER FOR INFORMATION. ALL OF HAWKEYE'S INFORMATION IS DIRECTLY SUPPORTED BY PUBLICALLY AVAILABLE PUBLISHED DECISIONS OF U.S. FEDERAL COURTS AND AGENCIES. The same information is available to the staff of the SEC. hawkeye not a magician. hawkeye find all of his information through standard legal research tools.

To: junglejims who wrote (2756)	10/20/1999 10:56:00 PM
From: robert freda	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 3679

<<and his comment was why don't you phone her and ask her and see if she will tell you>> I hope you're kidding about this. I can't believe that anyone from the SEC would actually have the nerve to treat you and this issue with such contempt. They should at least check this out and go back and read the ethics procedures they are supposed to follow. To call this a fair and due process is a complete joke, a ten day suspension has been more than 1 1/2 years! The SEC is supposed to be cracking down on financial abuses, recently issuing SAB 99 which basically eliminates materiality as a defense to booking or not booking certain financial transactions. Chairman Arthur Levitt issued a statement saying (paraphrased) that any earnings manipulation will not be tolerated in the future. If the chairman wants to "raise the bar" and hold companies to a higher standard, maybe his organization should be held to an even higher standard to encourage public compliance. I think your exchange with that "representative" should be elevated to someone with less arrogance and a lot more intelligence. Anyone out there listening?