SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: t2 who wrote (30971)10/20/1999 7:57:00 PM
From: Jill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Doesn't it remind you just a little of CPQ blaming anything and everything but itself? IBM pulled PCs from the stores. In spite of Gerstner's B2B rally call a while back, which sent stock zooming, couldn't hold in face of poor results.

But I hate to say it, I think it may pull down MSFT's rise tomorrow. A bit anyway

Jill



To: t2 who wrote (30971)10/20/1999 8:03:00 PM
From: J. P.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Plus IBM sells a lot of midrange and mainframe hardware and software. Anybody who works in the corporate I.T. environment can tell you that no money is allocated for fourth quarter this year to purchase new hardware or software. There is a complete freeze out until after the fallout from Y2K is dealt with. Signing a liscensing agreement with Microsoft is a no brainer though, because what else are you going to do? Replace your NT network with Linux? -g-



To: t2 who wrote (30971)10/20/1999 8:21:00 PM
From: Jean M. Gauthier  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Wall street is not that sophisticated....

Naz will go down 40-50 points tomorrow, all based on IBM crap.

They are very weak in hardware, and have only managed to come back on service/consulting revenue. Everybody is eating their lunch.

1- Dell, Gtw in PC's
2- Dell & Compaq in x86 servers
3- EMC in storage
4- SUN in all Unix equipment.

What's left ?

Mainframe, and it is a slow replacement business, at best.

Will the street see the difference ... No !

Funny, I knew this would happen, but did not have the courage of my convictions, as my own personal experience with IBM is that they were hurting already.

I thought the stree was more intelligent, but obviously not

Mark my words

take care
Jean



To: t2 who wrote (30971)10/20/1999 9:58:00 PM
From: John F. Dowd  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
t2: The institutional investor seems to be the big jerk in the investing world for the last five years. They have missed every market turn so far. They are going to use the IBM statement along with SAP's Y2K excuse to hold the market back while they get aboard. They send their mouthpieces to manipulate the market through appearances on TV. If it weren't for their size they would be out of luck. I can't understand the futures picture either. IBM is really not a bell weather when it comes to the NAZ. But from what I have seen they seem to throw the baby out with the bathwater continually as the fund managers try and compete with the indexes. This is truly an Alice and Wonderland market. JFD



To: t2 who wrote (30971)10/21/1999 11:54:00 PM
From: EepOpp  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
speaking of blaming problems on Y2K, i read somewhere that the airlines was using that as an excuse for any of the delays they may have had on their flights. hmmm....

EO