SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Claude who wrote (2537)10/21/1999 8:49:00 AM
From: HVN  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 34857
 
Well, to date no one has been able to to prove beyond doubt that smoking causes cancer. And I don't want to wait around till someone DOES prove that the radiation causes harm. I've seen how much of a field my cellular phone can create with my laptop computer and my cable TV box, it's pretty strong.

I use well over 1500 mins/month of wireless time, and AM now worried coz. I use a Nokia. The radiation from these phones is significantly higher than the motorolas. When I worked in the industry, our engineers were definitely quite concerned about the shielding issues - not just to comply with the FCC 0.6 watt requirements, but from a user perspective as well. We simply chose to ignore the health issues - basically a sort of self denial. I guess since you work for Qualcomm (or someone similar), you're in the same frame of mind.



To: Claude who wrote (2537)10/21/1999 10:08:00 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 34857
 
20/20 make quite a point that the handsets were tested in analog mode but didn't say why that was relevant. Does anyone know if there is some inherent difference in radiation between digital and analog?

Karen