Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Systems, Strategies and Resources for Trading Futures -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Matthew L. Jones who wrote (38459)	10/23/1999 5:40:00 PM
From: Patrick Slevin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44573

<What was that tech bear case again? (Here was the big question of the week. A week that turned out to be a fabulous one for the bulls. One that was so great that the bears even stooped to using Maria Bartiromo to float a "Cisco (CSCO:Nasdaq) to preannounce bad numbers" rumor at the bell because it was such a tough week!! That's bending to the 52-week lows of short-selling portfolio management!!) > That's opinion. As a matter of fact, Jim Cramer's piece is all opinion. He is a rather bombastic type....not an issue. Traders often are. They grasp a concept one way or the other and run with it. But I don't see anything in his piece that persuades me to think along his lines. Essentially it's a power piece, he overwhelms with rhetoric. But I don't see anything he says is anything other than that. He's a very powerful, emotional writer. But what he says is not going to change what will happen, one way or the other. I'm just saying that nothing he wrote suggests to me anything other than from the heart. Point out what you think was important. It's several paragraphs long, and I find the salient issues difficult to fathom.